Thursday April 22, 2010 at 6:55

“Institutions will try to preserve the problem to which they are the solution.” — Clay Shirky”

The Technium: The Shirky Principle

Comments

Monday April 12, 2010 at 10:55

Comments

Sunday April 11, 2010 at 17:18

Comments

Friday November 13, 2009 at 10:04

“universal health care will be doomed if there are not enough primary care doctors”

Doctor and Patient - Primary Care’s Image Problem - NYTimes.com

So true, but not the whole story.

The JAMA study of medical students cited in the article describes medical students looking at the impossible pressures and manifest misery of the typical primary care physician.  98% of those medical students made the logical conclusion to avoid a career in primary care internal medicine.

This is not so much an ‘image problem’ as stated in the headline, but a problem of the typical office practice operating in a broken paradigm.  The story is incomplete in failing to note the green shoots of primary care practices discovering new paradigms that free the physician to do what’s right.

My heroes are doctors like Jean Antonucci MD in Farmington ME, John Brady MD in Newport News VA, Aaron Blackledge MD San Francisco, and a host of others who reject the assumptions of the status quo and achieve brilliance in delivering better care.

Medical students who visit practices like theirs come away understanding the potential of high functioning primary care, the better outcomes, the improved satisfaction with care and the satisfaction of living up to the highest ideals of our profession.

Comments

Wednesday November 11, 2009 at 18:34

Comments

Tuesday November 10, 2009 at 18:29

Comments

Saturday October 03, 2009 at 10:00

Should insurance contracts come with black box warnings?

A colleague wrote:

If your practice is what you want it to be, then do not spoil it by taking (hundreds of) Medicare patients in order to fulfill the criteria for the stimulus money. Doctors have been giving up autonomy for money for years and that is why 58% would quit medicine if given the chance. If you feel your practice is financially faltering and you need an infusion of more patients or you particularly like elderly patients, then go for it. But do not let the beauty of the spinach entice you to taste the toxic stew unless you are starving and there is no other food around.

I know I accept insurance and therefore have been drinking the stew for years, but I realize how it zaps my strength and had initiated a cancerous growth that will almost certainly force me to stop practicing medicine early. Nearly every week I ponder the idea of breaking from the insurance industry. The reality is my practice would not financially survive. My patients don’t want to/can’t pay more than a simple co-pay. The federal stimulus will help my bottom line. Increasing primary care pay will help my bottom line. But, the stupid stupid stupid administrative stuff is what kills and that is what you accept when you sign on the dotted Medicare line. Insurance contracts should come with a skull and crossbones on the front page (open at your own risk). [emphasis added]

John

What an interesting idea.  Since more and more primary care physicians are realizing that continued contracting with the insurance industry is forcing them into a downward spiral of more and more ‘productivity’ at the expense of their patients and professionalism, maybe we should be lobbying for black box warnings on contracts?

WARNING TO PHYSICIANS:  Used as intended, this contract could lead to direct patient harm in the event we choose to deny needed care or delay care through endless paperwork.  This harm may in some cases lead to premature death or permanent disability.  Signing this contract could force your practice into financial penury and increases the risk of career burnout.  Numerous studies have demonstrated that this risk is particularly high for primary care physicians. Physicians should seriously consider the ethical and professional implications of signing this contract.


WARNING TO PATIENTS:  Signing this contract in no way obligates the insurer (us) to provide insurance coverage for the member (you), though it does obligate the member to provide monthly payment to the insurer.  If the member becomes ill and needs significant help* (*’significant’ is a subjective term that will be interpreted solely by the insurer’s employed clerks) we reserve the right to continue to collect monthly premiums while denying services.  Signing this contract means the member has waived forever the right to sue.  If there is ever a disagreement, the member must use our designated and beholden stable of arbitration lawyers in a complete sham of legal justice.

Primum non nocere

Comments

Friday October 02, 2009 at 10:12

A peek at the tip of the iceberg of paperwork sinking the great Titanic of US healthcare.

Comments

Friday September 25, 2009 at 12:24

“We really need a national conversation about how we measure quality. The Cartesian verbatim approach is missing the forest for the trees.”

Ideal Medical Practices: Clinical gist and what we measure

An interesting commentary from JAMA on verbatim and gist memory & implications on how we measure medical quality.

Comments

Friday September 25, 2009 at 10:31

Comments

Page 1 of 7